Home/Science
Most companies in this category describe their sensor in language designed to end the conversation. This page is the opposite.

Four steps, and the interesting one is the first. Sweat carries the free fraction of cortisol: the portion not bound to carrier proteins, and the portion your tissues actually respond to.
Step one
The free fraction
Most circulating cortisol is protein-bound and unavailable to tissue. Sweat carries the unbound part.
Step two
It binds
A thin layer on the sensor surface is shaped so cortisol molecules lock into it.
Step three
It becomes a signal
That binding is converted into a small electrical signal. A second electrode alongside corrects for background noise, which on a wrist across a day is substantial.
Step four
It becomes a shape
Read continuously rather than at intervals, so the sharp rise after waking and the overnight floor are both in view.
Stated as a pair, because a claim with a footnote is not the same thing as an honest account of what is and is not established.
Established
This is settled endocrinology, not a company claim. The unbound portion is the one that acts on tissue, and it is the portion sweat carries. It is the reason this approach is interesting rather than merely convenient.
Not yet earned
The Curve has not been validated against a laboratory reference. We removed an earlier figure from this site rather than let it stand on work that did not support it. When validation runs, the number and its method will be published together.
Established
The features that matter most in a cortisol day are the ones a clinic-hour sample misses: the sharp post-waking rise and the overnight floor. That is a property of the sampling, not a claim about this device.
Not yet earned
Medical-device clearance is a claim bought with clinical evidence. We would like to earn it. We have not, and no third-party validation exists.
A standard serum test typically reports total cortisol, the bound and unbound together. Most of that total is attached to carrier proteins and is not available to act on tissue.
So comparing a sweat reading directly against a total-serum number is not a like-for-like comparison, and any validation work has to account for that rather than assume the two should match. That is a harder study to design, and it is the honest one.
The physiology this rests on is covered in Cortisol 101; the practical comparison between methods is in measuring cortisol.
There is no published figure. The device has not been validated against a laboratory reference. When that work is done, the number and the method behind it will be published together. Until then, treat the absence of a figure as the honest answer rather than an oversight.
Not identical. Sweat carries the free, biologically active fraction; a standard blood test usually reports total cortisol, most of which is bound to carrier proteins. They are related quantities measuring different things, and validation has to account for that rather than assume they should agree exactly.
No. It is a general wellness device under Health Canada and FDA guidance, and it does not diagnose, treat, or cure anything. Earning medical-device clearance is a longer-term ambition that requires clinical evidence we do not have.
Yes. That is the intent of this page. Some detail is held back for now while intellectual property filings are in progress, and we would rather say that plainly than pretend the gaps are not there.
Auromone Curve is a general wellness device under Health Canada and FDA guidance. It is not intended to diagnose, treat, or cure any condition. The product is in development and final performance may differ from the specifications described here.
Deeper write-ups belong here: sweat against saliva and blood as sample types, and the validation methodology once it runs. They are in preparation.
Join the waitlist